@MGawad yes this field is “Other Seller ID (BT-29)”. This should include Sub-CR of the branch for which invoice is issued. In case you have multiple Sub-CRs and your XMLs do not cover all your different Sub-CRs then ZATCA’s email is referring to those Sub-CRs which are active but are not specified in XMLs submitted to ZATCA.
@Ankit_Tiwari thanks ,
<cbc:ID schemeID=“CRN”>402020112</cbc:ID>
Do we need to include the main CRN in the XML for the branch, or is it sufficient to just include the branch’s CRN ?
I’m registering the branch’s CRN, but I’m receiving this email from the authority. Is it possible that there’s a sub CRN that hasn’t issued any invoices before, could that be the reason?
@Ankit_Tiwari, If there are multiple CRN numbers, how should they be populated in the XML? Should they be included within a single XML tag separated by commas, or should multiple “Other Seller ID” (BT-29) tags be used?
Example:
<cac:AccountingSupplierParty>
<cac:Party>
<cac:PartyIdentification>
<cbc:ID schemeID="CRN">10001100,203303003</cbc:ID>
</cac:PartyIdentification>
</cac:Party>
</cac:AccountingSupplierParty>```
**Or**
```<cac:AccountingSupplierParty>
<cac:Party>
<cac:PartyIdentification>
<cbc:ID schemeID="CRN">10001100</cbc:ID>
<cbc:ID schemeID="CRN">203303003</cbc:ID>
</cac:PartyIdentification>
</cac:Party>
</cac:AccountingSupplierParty>
@sameer you should not include multiple CRNs in XML. You have to provide only 1 ID.